<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do do XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/</link>
	<description>Working software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t do XP &#171; Agile Anarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t do XP &#171; Agile Anarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-603</guid>
		<description>[...] October 12, 2009 &#183; 36 Comments  Steve Freeman offers a counter-argument on his blog entitled Do do Scrum. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 12, 2009 &middot; 36 Comments  Steve Freeman offers a counter-argument on his blog entitled Do do Scrum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias Mayer</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-602</guid>
		<description>@Niklas
&gt; I get the feeling that Tobias got carried away by the blog rule of being provocative in order to get readers
That may be true, but nevertheless I do believe that selling XP to clients is more counter-productive than productive.  I agree that XP &quot;has done a tremendous service for the software community&quot; and I also think it is time to move past the prescriptive nature of XP, and focus on how to guide people to good practice.  If, as everyone in the XP community seems to saying, people are not finding good practice for themselves, I can only conclude that we do a lousy job of coaching and mentoring.

If we guide well, they may find XP and take it on wholeheartedly, or they may find or invent additional practices.  In either case the empowerment that will bring is worth the wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niklas<br />
&gt; I get the feeling that Tobias got carried away by the blog rule of being provocative in order to get readers<br />
That may be true, but nevertheless I do believe that selling XP to clients is more counter-productive than productive.  I agree that XP &#8220;has done a tremendous service for the software community&#8221; and I also think it is time to move past the prescriptive nature of <span class="caps">XP, </span>and focus on how to guide people to good practice.  If, as everyone in the XP community seems to saying, people are not finding good practice for themselves, I can only conclude that we do a lousy job of coaching and mentoring.</p>
<p>If we guide well, they may find XP and take it on wholeheartedly, or they may find or invent additional practices.  In either case the empowerment that will bring is worth the wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Bjørnerstedt</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Bjørnerstedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I agree with Steve here. I get the feeling that Tobias got carried away by the blog rule of being provocative in order to get readers. XP has done a tremendous service for the software community. As with patterns one often forgotten value with XP is that it put names on things that existed earlier but were often mixed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve here. I get the feeling that Tobias got carried away by the blog rule of being provocative in order to get readers. XP has done a tremendous service for the software community. As with patterns one often forgotten value with XP is that it put names on things that existed earlier but were often mixed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Storming phase of the (agile) IT world « Paircoaching’s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>The Storming phase of the (agile) IT world « Paircoaching’s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-600</guid>
		<description>[...] Bob&#039;s response. Tobias writing a blog post to stop doing XP. vs Steve reaction&#039;s to keep doing XP (Read Tobias answer in the comments to understand the whole discussion) I could add a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bob&#8217;s response. Tobias writing a blog post to stop doing <span class="caps">XP. </span>vs Steve reaction&#8217;s to keep doing XP (Read Tobias answer in the comments to understand the whole discussion) I could add a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias Mayer</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Steve, there is a bit of a misunderstanding.  When I said I haven&#039;t &quot;done XP&quot; I was using the reference from my previous blog of &quot;Doing Scrum&quot; being meaningless.

I have certainly used all the practices of XP, and I like them.  There is nothing about the values and practices of XP that I dislike.  I have also found that indeed they lead to better code, better value and a happier work environment.  What I don&#039;t like is the idea that Scrum or other Agile coaches have to tell teams to &quot;do XP&quot;.  It is counterproductive.  As you so rightly point out most software companies are so far from having quality code that throwing XP at them will be meaningless.  

Yes, the software craftsmanship movement grew out of XP, and perhaps this outgrowing is telling us that the focus should now simply be on good craftsmanship within an empowered environment.  You (and others) may use the term XP as a short way of saying that, but it is not always (and perhaps rarely) useful.  Focus on the practices, not the methodology.  That was the message of my blog post.  I knew it would offend people, but offense was not my primary goal :-)

Anyway, good post and thanks for writing a counter-argument to mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, there is a bit of a misunderstanding.  When I said I haven&#8217;t &#8220;done XP&#8221; I was using the reference from my previous blog of &#8220;Doing Scrum&#8221; being meaningless.</p>
<p>I have certainly used all the practices of <span class="caps">XP, </span>and I like them.  There is nothing about the values and practices of XP that I dislike.  I have also found that indeed they lead to better code, better value and a happier work environment.  What I don&#8217;t like is the idea that Scrum or other Agile coaches have to tell teams to &#8220;do XP&#8221;.  It is counterproductive.  As you so rightly point out most software companies are so far from having quality code that throwing XP at them will be meaningless.  </p>
<p>Yes, the software craftsmanship movement grew out of <span class="caps">XP, </span>and perhaps this outgrowing is telling us that the focus should now simply be on good craftsmanship within an empowered environment.  You (and others) may use the term XP as a short way of saying that, but it is not always (and perhaps rarely) useful.  Focus on the practices, not the methodology.  That was the message of my blog post.  I knew it would offend people, but offense was not my primary goal <img src='http://www.m3p.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, good post and thanks for writing a counter-argument to mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Do do XP &#124; Steve Freeman -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/10/13/do-do-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Do do XP &#124; Steve Freeman -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/?p=290#comment-598</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marc Evers. Marc Evers said: RT @johanneslink: &quot;do do xp&quot; http://bit.ly/4nRgJi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marc Evers. Marc Evers said: RT @johanneslink: &#34;do do xp&#34; <a href="http://bit.ly/4nRgJi" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4nRgJi</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
