<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Develop your intuition for maths.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/01/13/develop-your-intuition-for-maths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/01/13/develop-your-intuition-for-maths/</link>
	<description>Working software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:22:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/01/13/develop-your-intuition-for-maths/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2009/01/13/develop-your-intuition-for-maths/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that.

I got a degree in maths but always felt I wasn&#039;t a mathematician. I couldn&#039;t produce maths, just reproduce. I wasn&#039;t bad, and did pure applied and statistics equally in my final year. I could get immersed in the world. Occasionally a lecturer would talk about the history (actually it was one statistics lecturer - I remember him talking about Florence Nightingales contributions). I always wanted background, to know people&#039;s deadends in thinking, but there didn&#039;t seem to be time for that.

There is still a lot to learn from the ingenuity of final solutions. In real life though, I find a series of dead ends and frustrations and imperfections.

I got what I asked for for Christmas which was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Euler-Master-All-William-Dunham/dp/0883853280/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1231880920&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Euler - The Master of Us All&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s a good read and gives the context for his insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that.</p>
<p>I got a degree in maths but always felt I wasn&#8217;t a mathematician. I couldn&#8217;t produce maths, just reproduce. I wasn&#8217;t bad, and did pure applied and statistics equally in my final year. I could get immersed in the world. Occasionally a lecturer would talk about the history (actually it was one statistics lecturer &#8211; I remember him talking about Florence Nightingales contributions). I always wanted background, to know people&#8217;s deadends in thinking, but there didn&#8217;t seem to be time for that.</p>
<p>There is still a lot to learn from the ingenuity of final solutions. In real life though, I find a series of dead ends and frustrations and imperfections.</p>
<p>I got what I asked for for Christmas which was <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Euler-Master-All-William-Dunham/dp/0883853280/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1231880920&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">Euler &#8211; The Master of Us All</a>. It&#8217;s a good read and gives the context for his insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
