<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another reason for licensing programmers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/</link>
	<description>Working software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:22:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Another reason for licensing programmers &#124; Steve Freeman -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Another reason for licensing programmers &#124; Steve Freeman -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SteveF , Philip Schwarz. Philip Schwarz said: RT @sf105 Nice to see the Stuart Wray&#039;s paper published. I wrote up his comparison of coding to gambling a while ago http://bit.ly/4xajAK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SteveF , Philip Schwarz. Philip Schwarz said: RT @sf105 Nice to see the Stuart Wray&#39;s paper published. I wrote up his comparison of coding to gambling a while ago <a href="http://bit.ly/4xajAK" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4xajAK</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O. B. Server</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>O. B. Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>re: &quot;Instead of taking a step back and learn and understand the underlying technology or conceptual model we go on trying things and hope that the things we try will fix the problem.&quot;

That&#039;s bang-on. 

The &quot;continual hope that the next fix will be the right one&quot;, etc. Sounds like a classic case of not understanding the problem. (Easier said than remedied, alas.) 

I know the feeling only too well, as in the early 1990&#039;s I had the extreme pleasure of maintaining ICL&#039;s OfficePower after way too many fingers had been in the pie, so to speak.   (Offending bits re-written, hopefully, in the intervening years.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: &#8220;Instead of taking a step back and learn and understand the underlying technology or conceptual model we go on trying things and hope that the things we try will fix the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s bang-on. </p>
<p>The &#8220;continual hope that the next fix will be the right one&#8221;, etc. Sounds like a classic case of not understanding the problem. (Easier said than remedied, alas.) </p>
<p>I know the feeling only too well, as in the early 1990&#8217;s I had the extreme pleasure of maintaining <span class="caps">ICL&#8217;</span>s OfficePower after way too many fingers had been in the pie, so to speak.   (Offending bits re-written, hopefully, in the intervening years.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m3p.co.uk/blog/2008/08/12/another-reason-for-licensing-programmers/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing up this concept of  &quot;Variable Ratio&quot;. I&#039;ve seen this a lot in myself and others. Instead of taking a step back and learn and understand the underlying technology or conceptual model we go on trying things and hope that the things we try will fix the problem.

Examples: 
Instead of having a whole understanding of how css works the developer tweaks a little bit in one browser to only discover that it doesn&#039;t work in another.

Without reading the documentation and without looking at the source code to understand the inner work of a library, we try to use the library and make changes after changes with the hope that it will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing up this concept of  &#8220;Variable Ratio&#8221;. I&#8217;ve seen this a lot in myself and others. Instead of taking a step back and learn and understand the underlying technology or conceptual model we go on trying things and hope that the things we try will fix the problem.</p>
<p>Examples: <br />
Instead of having a whole understanding of how css works the developer tweaks a little bit in one browser to only discover that it doesn&#8217;t work in another.</p>
<p>Without reading the documentation and without looking at the source code to understand the inner work of a library, we try to use the library and make changes after changes with the hope that it will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
